Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site calmasd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcc3!sdcc6!calmasd!gail
From: gail@calmasd.UUCP (Gail B. Hanrahan)
Newsgroups: net.auto,net.flame,net.kids,net.singles
Subject: Re: Seat belts
Message-ID: <335@calmasd.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 17-Apr-85 23:16:12 EST
Article-I.D.: calmasd.335
Posted: Wed Apr 17 23:16:12 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 19-Apr-85 01:58:14 EST
References: <429@gargoyle.UChicago.UUCP>
Reply-To: gail@calmasd.UUCP (Gail B. Hanrahan)
Organization: Calma Company, San Diego, CA
Lines: 16
Xref: watmath net.auto:6445 net.flame:9354 net.kids:1190 net.singles:6702


I think it's pretty well established that it's smart to wear a
seat belt.  But if I don't wear a seat belt, I'm not endangering
anyone but myself. 

The REAL issue is, should the government(s) be making laws
*requiring* people to wear seat belts just because it's "for
your own good"?  Can we next expect legislation requiring us to
take vitamins, as well?  [sarcasm]

Where do we draw the line?


Gail Bayley Hanrahan
Calma Company, San Diego
{ihnp4,decvax,ucbvax}!sdcsvax!calmasd!gail