Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site spar.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!philabs!prls!amdimage!amdcad!decwrl!spar!baba
From: baba@spar.UUCP (Baba ROM DOS)
Newsgroups: net.politics,net.flame,net.legal
Subject: Re: Personal Defenses
Message-ID: <188@spar.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 17-Apr-85 02:06:17 EST
Article-I.D.: spar.188
Posted: Wed Apr 17 02:06:17 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 20-Apr-85 03:13:59 EST
References: <1518@decwrl.UUCP> <420@utai.UUCP> <539@ihu1h.UUCP>
Organization: Schlumberger Palo Alto Research, CA
Lines: 10
Xref: watmath net.politics:8583 net.flame:9366 net.legal:1571

> I think the point of whether it is good or not good to carry personal
> defense weapons (unconcealed) is moot when compared with the fact that if I
> WANT to and am not violating someone else's personal rights, I should be
> able to. I think that says it all.
> 					Jay Mitchell

The trouble is that some people feel they have a personal right not to
be faced with an implicit threat of armed force.

					Baba