Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site psuvax1.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!mcnc!idis!cadre!psuvax1!simon
From: simon@psuvax1.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.auto,net.flame,net.kids,net.singles
Subject: Re: Seat belts
Message-ID: <1638@psuvax1.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 20-Apr-85 23:12:25 EST
Article-I.D.: psuvax1.1638
Posted: Sat Apr 20 23:12:25 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 25-Apr-85 04:19:54 EST
References: <429@gargoyle.UChicago.UUCP> <335@calmasd.UUCP>
Organization: Pennsylvania State Univ.
Lines: 25
Xref: watmath net.auto:6539 net.flame:9485 net.kids:1231 net.singles:6771

> 
> I think it's pretty well established that it's smart to wear a
> seat belt.  But if I don't wear a seat belt, I'm not endangering
> anyone but myself. 
> 
> The REAL issue is, should the government(s) be making laws
> *requiring* people to wear seat belts just because it's "for
> your own good"?  Can we next expect legislation requiring us to
> take vitamins, as well?  [sarcasm]
> 
> Where do we draw the line?
> 
> 
> Gail Bayley Hanrahan
> Calma Company, San Diego
> {ihnp4,decvax,ucbvax}!sdcsvax!calmasd!gail

I think it is also well established that not wearing a seat belt makes driving
less safe for others. In an emergency, not being thrown about the car may give
you the ability to stay in control. Racing drivers use seat belts because it 
helps their driving.

We should not expect legislation requiring us to take vitamins, but we should
expect (and do have) legislation that prohibits driving while one's ability 
is impaired by drugs, alcohol or inability to see well.