Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watdaisy.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!watdaisy!ndiamond
From: ndiamond@watdaisy.UUCP (Norman Diamond)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: C question
Message-ID: <7192@watdaisy.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 12-Apr-85 17:30:06 EST
Article-I.D.: watdaisy.7192
Posted: Fri Apr 12 17:30:06 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 13-Apr-85 02:43:45 EST
References: <5272@tektronix.UUCP> <230@aluxp.UUCP> <288@bdaemon.UUCP> <26@harvard.ARPA>
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 23

> Regarding the question about x = x++ and a[i] = i++ and similarly
> ambiguous constructs:  Why the (*@#$%^*^ can't the compiler complain
> rather than flipping a coin?

The C compiler is perfectly capable of generating code for one of the
valid meanings.  (At least some compilers are.  Some are capable of
generating invalid code, but that's beside the point.)

> Programs with statements like these are
> WRONG, just as wrong as one with a missing brace.

True.  Is lint still occasionally maintained?  Will new tests be added
as their necessity becomes apparent?

-- 

   Norman Diamond

UUCP:  {decvax|utzoo|ihnp4|allegra}!watmath!watdaisy!ndiamond
CSNET: ndiamond%watdaisy@waterloo.csnet
ARPA:  ndiamond%watdaisy%waterloo.csnet@csnet-relay.arpa

"Opinions are those of the keyboard, and do not reflect on me or higher-ups."