Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 7/1/84; site wuphys.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!bellcore!sabre!zeta!epsilon!gamma!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!mgnetp!we53!busch!wuphys!fek
From: fek@wuphys.UUCP (Frank Kramer)
Newsgroups: net.micro.apple
Subject: Aztec C for Apple IIe - opinions ?
Message-ID: <261@wuphys.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 18-Apr-85 11:20:54 EST
Article-I.D.: wuphys.261
Posted: Thu Apr 18 11:20:54 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 21-Apr-85 04:19:09 EST
Distribution: net
Organization: Physics Dept., Washington Univ. in St. Louis
Lines: 22


I have been developing software for a number of micros and currently
use Apple Pascal for The Apple II line.  However, I am running into
many situations where a customer does not want to buy AP just to run
my programs.  Also, I don't care to pay Softech's high royalties for
distributing run-time packages.  Sooooo...

Concerning Aztec's C package for the Apple II :

1) Does anyone have opinions (good, bad) on it?
2) Does the native 6502 code produced require substantially more disk
space than p-code?
3) Will I find that I really miss my Apple Pascal?

Please mail me any info that you can.

Thanks in advance,

Frank 
ihnp4!wuphys