Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watmath.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!water!watbun!kgdykes
From: kgdykes@watbun.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.motss
Subject: Re re re Question about Flavoured Lubes (sophie)
Message-ID: <14036@watmath.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 20-Apr-85 19:09:30 EST
Article-I.D.: watmath.14036
Posted: Sat Apr 20 19:09:30 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 21-Apr-85 05:42:20 EST
Sender: daemon@watmath.UUCP
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 37


> From: sophie@mnetor.UUCP (Sophie Quigley)
> Date: 19 Apr 85 20:08:24 GMT
> 
> > REFERENCES:  <1634@decwrl.UUCP>
> > 
> >       I read the note on small dicks, I have a very large
> > one, yet I enjoy a small one just as well. Its the person 
> > that counts to me.
> 
> Add to that the note from Ray about being complimented for his big penis.
> 
> Come on guys!  if you are sincerely trying to make us believe that you believe
> that size doesn't count, try bragging a bit less about how well-endowed (read
> "I am so lucky" => "size is of some importance") you are.
> 
> If size is not important, how come none of the "less fortunate" haven't
> spoken up yet? (or do you all come in "jumbo", "super-jumbo" and
> "colossal"?  <-:).
> -- 
> Sophie Quigley

:-)  Of course I am only three inches...
:-)  But then, width isn't everyting!
 
You want TOTAL honesty??? As far as I am concerned, "size" means nothing
to a relationship, but for outright casual sex why not go for physical
"perfection" (In my books that means not too large or too small).


              - Ken Dykes
                Software Development Group, U. of Waterloo
                Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.  N2L 3G1
                {clyde,utzoo}!watmath!watbun!kgdykes

Remember, put your best FOOT forward.... :-)