Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.PCS 1/10/84; site ahutb.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!whuxlm!whuxl!houxm!mhuxt!mhuxr!ihnp4!drutx!ahuta!ahutb!leeper From: leeper@ahutb.UUCP (m.r.leeper) Newsgroups: net.movies,net.sf-lovers Subject: LADYHAWKE Message-ID: <664@ahutb.UUCP> Date: Mon, 15-Apr-85 08:02:08 EST Article-I.D.: ahutb.664 Posted: Mon Apr 15 08:02:08 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 20-Apr-85 04:59:31 EST Organization: AT&T Information Systems Labs, Holmdel NJ Lines: 58 Xref: linus net.movies:4359 net.sf-lovers:5984 LADYHAWKE A film review by Mark R. Leeper Based on boxoffice results, I may be one of the very few people in the world who liked DRAGONSLAYER. I very simply thought that it was the best historical fantasy film that I had ever seen. Up to that point, I would have judged films like THE SEVENTH VOYAGE OF SINBAD and JASON AND THE ARGONAUTS as my favorites. But DRAGONSLAYER for the first time had a plot that would have made a decent fantasy novel, and that was head and shoulders above anything similar I'd ever seen on the screen. When I saw the coming attractions for LADYHAWKE, for the first time I thought a film was coming out that could be comparable in quality to DRAGONSLAYER. Well, it didn't replace DRAGONSLAYER as my top historical fantasy but it easily comes in second. LADYHAWKE is a beautiful fantasy film set in Medieval France. It follows the adventures of a likeable young pickpocket played unexpectedly well by Matthew Broderick. He escapes from the evil bishop's dungeons and is about to be re-captured when he is saved by the mysterious stranger Navarre (Rutger Hauer) who travels with a hawk on his arm. At night man and hawk disappear and are replaced by a beautiful woman who is often seen in the company of a large and fierce wolf. The man and woman, it seems, are lovers forever together but forever apart. A curse by the jealous bishop turns Navarre into a wolf at night; his lover Isabeau becomes a hawk by day. The story has a marvelous feel of real legend about it, and a haunting beauty in the way it has been visualized on the screen. Matthew Broderick's Phillipe is the main character and at the same time comic relief. Broderick incessantly talks to God like Tevya does in FIDDLER ON THE ROOF, but not always so reverently. He seems much better in the role than I expected. Rutget Hauer is nearly perfect as the mysterious Navarre. And lovely Michelle Pfeiffer of SCARFACE and INTO THE NIGHT is terrible as Navarre's lover. The problem is that she talks like an American and wears lipstick and eye-liner. She fits into the Medieval setting only slightly better than Pacman. And speaking of things out of place, Andrew Powell's rock score is totally inappropriate. He takes scenes that otherwise have a beautiful period and wreaks real havoc with the spirit and texture of the film. A couple more faults, if you please. The camera work is usually very good, but the use of color filters, particularly for the sky, is overdone. And speaking of the sky, if you watch the moon and know some astronomy, you will see something happen that is actually an impossibility. The script is generally good, but too much of the legend we are simply told rather than shown. Also note the anachronistic use of terrycloth. Yet with all these faults, and more, this remains one beautiful and enjoyable fantasy film. The settings, the photography, Hauer's acting, the idea of the story are all marvelously realized. If this film dies at the boxoffice the way DRAGONSLAYER did, perhaps modern audiences don't deserve good fantasy. Mark R. Leeper ...ihnp4!ahutb!leeper But, on May 1, I become ...ihnp4!mtgzz!leeper