Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site sftri.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!mhuxm!sftig!sftri!rajeev From: rajeev@sftri.UUCP (S.Rajeev) Newsgroups: net.nlang.india Subject: Lee Kuan Yew on Singapore and Indians Message-ID: <398@sftri.UUCP> Date: Thu, 11-Apr-85 18:00:23 EST Article-I.D.: sftri.398 Posted: Thu Apr 11 18:00:23 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 13-Apr-85 03:26:58 EST Distribution: net Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Summit N.J. Lines: 37 From an article in the New York Times, April 11, about "The Politics of Ruling and Romance in Singapore" Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew has mad politics interesting again in Singapore, though probably not in a way he intended. ...... To quote again: Mr. Lee recently added fuel to the debate on Singapore's future with a sustained attack in Parliament on "Western" values, under whose umbrella he lumped birth-control pills, American libel suits and Indian political practices. The Prime Minister .... has drawn close in recent public statements to a strong belief in traditional Chinese values. In March ... he told Parliament that Singapore's political success had been a success because its people were overwhelmingly ethnic Chinese. "Had the mix in Singapore been different", the Prime Minister said, "had it been 75 % Indians, 15 % Malays and the rest Chinese, it would not have worked." Now this bothers me because I had always felt that Singapore would be a good place for Indians to do business in, partly because of the (10% ?) Indian population. Do Lee's statements portend some sort of anti-Indian policy or a sons-of-the-soil attitude? I'd appreciate any comments by people in the know. -- ...ihnp4!attunix!rajeev -- usenet ihnp4!attunix!rajeev@BERKELEY -- arpanet Sri Rajeev, SF 1-342, Bell Labs, Summit, NJ 07901. (201)-522-6330.