Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site sftri.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!mhuxm!sftig!sftri!rajeev From: rajeev@sftri.UUCP (S.Rajeev) Newsgroups: net.nlang.india Subject: In defense of caste-based reservation Message-ID: <403@sftri.UUCP> Date: Sun, 14-Apr-85 13:19:00 EST Article-I.D.: sftri.403 Posted: Sun Apr 14 13:19:00 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 15-Apr-85 01:12:16 EST Distribution: net Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Summit N.J. Lines: 72 The recent debate about this has prompted me to point out a few things that I feel justify caste-based reservation schemes. First of all, I think there are two questions to be answered: a) Should there be caste-based reservation? b) If so, how much should it be? From the responses I have seen, most people feel that the answer to a) is "no". I disagree. On b) I admit I have no real feeling for what would be fair to all parties. 50% reservation is almost certainly too high. One of the major criticisms has run along the following lines: "Why should a poor high-caste person be denied the opportunities that a rich low-caste person is given?" This is really a non-issue, I think, because as far as I know, there are income limits that apply in most cases, especially the backward castes (as opposed to SC/ST). So it really benefits the lower-income lower-caste person. Another issue is that of merit. On the face of it, it seems most fair to insist that merit be the only criterion. But what does "merit" mean, say, in the context of professional college admissions? Grades in an entrance examination, most likely. But these examinations are heavily biased in favor of middle-class, urban students. An example is the disproportionately large numbers of students entering the IITs from the major cities, not because they are intrinsically brighter, but because they had access to coaching that made them able to score better in the entrance exam. (This phenomenon happens in the US as well, where cramming academies turn out students expert at beating the SAT's.) Similarly, I claim that a Harijan doctor who will go back to help his/her community is more "worthy" of a medical college seat than a high-caste urban student who has every intention of emigrating as soon as possible. "Merit" is somewhat harder to measure than scores in standard admission tests. There are also good historical reasons for extending special concessions to backward castes: nobody will deny that the Harijan's life is still pretty miserable -- the age-old problems continue to exist. Compared to that, the very occasional cases of "reverse discrimination" are trivial in the larger context, however painful they are to the individuals concerned. Besides, the establishment is still full of the old-boy networks of upper-caste people, and there is surely considerable covert discrimination. The troubles that Harijans face are not because they are incapable: those who have converted to Islam and Christian sects and thus escaped the oppression have often made good. I think reservation should exits as long as certain sections of society are demonstrably getting less than their share of the pie. The really negative aspect of caste-based reservation, I recognize, is that it perpetuates caste-based politics, social interaction, etc. But then so does the use of caste-based surnames (e.g., Iyer, Reddy). But nobody has suggested that people should switch to context-free names. And as we change into a more urban, industrialized society, there will, one hopes, be less caste-consciousness. People will make class-based distinctions rather than caste-based distinctions. As regards a "fair" quota system, it's hard to generalize, but I think 20-30% might not be too unreasonable, with the proviso that if there are not sufficient numbers of backward-caste candidates, the extra openings will be added to the general pool. Finally, I have often heard that giving an underqualified Harijan a medical college seat is akin to giving him/her "a licence to kill". But remember, a large number of upper-caste doctors finished bottom of their classes, and some of them are surely using the above licence :-) To flamers: if you feel the urge to flame, please remember that I am not on trial, only my opinions are :-) -- ...ihnp4!attunix!rajeev -- usenet ihnp4!attunix!rajeev@BERKELEY -- arpanet Sri Rajeev, SF 1-342, Bell Labs, Summit, NJ 07901. (201)-522-6330.