Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site mhuxt.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!js2j
From: js2j@mhuxt.UUCP (sonntag)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: how much science?
Message-ID: <755@mhuxt.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 15-Apr-85 10:16:08 EST
Article-I.D.: mhuxt.755
Posted: Mon Apr 15 10:16:08 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 16-Apr-85 00:46:45 EST
References: <1448@hao.UUCP> <182@spp1.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill
Lines: 16

> Science should welcome all theories and not try to impose a criteria for
> what a "scientific" theory should be lest that basic premise be wrong and
> the truth be lost.
> 
> Anyone holding CONFIDENTLY to an origins theory sould not be upset by the
> "ravings" of those from opposing viewpoints since along with that
> confidence should be the belief that, given enough time, the wrong theory
> will prove itself to be so.
> 
> 		Mike Johnston

     Sometimes I wonder why I even attempt to argue with people like this.
-- 
Jeff Sonntag
ihnp4!mhuxt!js2j
    "Oh no.  It wasn't the airplanes.  'Twas beauty killed the beast."-King K.