Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cadovax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwrba!cadovax!keithd
From: keithd@cadovax.UUCP (Keith Doyle)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: The Scientific Case for Creation (Part 2)
Message-ID: <535@cadovax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 15-Apr-85 14:26:45 EST
Article-I.D.: cadovax.535
Posted: Mon Apr 15 14:26:45 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 18-Apr-85 04:46:30 EST
References: <329@iham1.UUCP>, <110@rocky2.UUCP>
Organization: Contel Cado, Torrance, CA
Lines: 12

[...............]
> 	What I find amazing is quoting references like these, some of them
> more than fifty years out of date, in a feeble effort to try and build up
> creationism by knocking down evolution. It doesn't work like that. You use
> the most recent evidence to support your case, not the oldest.
> 
> 		David Ross @NYU Medical Center
> 
> 		{allegra, seismo, ihnp4}!cmcl2!rocky2
> 
I expect those were the most recent.