Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site iham1.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!iham1!rck
From: rck@iham1.UUCP (Ron Kukuk)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: The Scientific Case for Creation: (Part 7)
Message-ID: <338@iham1.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 19-Apr-85 08:11:30 EST
Article-I.D.: iham1.338
Posted: Fri Apr 19 08:11:30 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 20-Apr-85 03:11:05 EST
Distribution: net
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 67


     THE SCIENTIFIC CASE FOR CREATION: 116 CATEGORIES OF EVIDENCE

I.  (Life Sciences): THE THEORY OF ORGANIC EVOLUTION IS INVALID.

    A.  EVOLUTION HAS NEVER BEEN OBSERVED. (See 1-13.)

    B.  ALL  ARGUMENTS  FOR  EVOLUTION  ARE  OUTDATED,  ILLOGICAL,  OR
        WISHFUL THINKING.

       14.  It is illogical  to  maintain  that  similarities  between
            different  species  imply a genealogical relationship [a];
            they may imply a common Designer.

            a)  ''. . . it is unscientific to maintain that morphology
                may  be  used  to prove relationships and evolution of
                the higher categories of units, . . . .'' [N. Heribert
                Nilsson,  (Lund  University),  SYNTHETISCHE ARTBILDUNG
                (Lund Sweden: Verlag CWK Gleerup, 1953), p. 1186.]

       15.  The existence of human organs whose  function  is  unknown
            does  not  imply that they are vestiges of organs from our
            evolutionary ancestors.  In fact, as medical knowledge has
            increased,  the functions of all of these organs have been
            discovered [a]. The widespread absence of vestigial organs
            implies that evolution never happened.

            a)  Jerry Bergman, ''Vestigial Organs:  Putative  Evidence
                for   Evolution   of   Homo   Sapiens''   (Unpublished
                Manuscript, 1306 North Orleans  Ave.,  Bowling  Green,
                Ohio 43402: 137 pages, 1984).

       16.  There are many single cell forms of life, but there are no
            forms  of  animal  life  with  2,  3,..., or even 20 cells
            [a,b]. If organic evolution happened, these forms of  life
            should   exist   in   great   abundance.    None  do.  The
            evolutionary tree has no trunk [c].

            a)  E. Lendell Cockrum and William  J.  McCauley,  ZOOLOGY
                (W. B. Saunders Company, 1965), p. 163.
            b)  Lynn Margulis and Karlene V. Schwartz, FIVE  KINGDOMS:
                AN  ILLUSTRATED  GUIDE  TO  THE PHYLA OF LIFE ON EARTH
                (San Francisco: W.H.  Freeman and Company, 1982),  pp.
                178-179.
            c)  Actually, the form of life that has just over 20 cells
                is  a very simple PARASITE called the mesozoa. It must
                have a complex animal as a host in order to provide it
                with  such functions as digestion and respiration. The
                mesozoa could not be the evolutionary predecessors  of
                any  so  called  higher  animals  since  it requires a
                higher animal as its  host.  Sponges,  the  next  most
                complex  form  of multicellular life, are so different
                from higher forms of life that even  evolutionists  do
                not  consider  them  as  ancestral  to  anything. (For
                example see Cockrum, above, p. 167.)

                                      ...


   II.  (Astronomical Sciences):

                               TO BE CONTINUED

  III.  (Earth Sciences):

					Ron Kukuk
					Walt Brown