Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site spp1.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwspp!spp1!johnston
From: johnston@spp1.UUCP (Micheal L. Johnston)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: Re: The Scientific Case for Creation (Part 1)
Message-ID: <188@spp1.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 16-Apr-85 11:34:32 EST
Article-I.D.: spp1.188
Posted: Tue Apr 16 11:34:32 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 21-Apr-85 05:49:09 EST
References: <328@iham1.UUCP> <550@ptsfa.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: TRW, Redondo Beach  CA
Lines: 15

> In article <328@iham1.UUCP> rck@iham1.UUCP (Ron Kukuk) writes:
> >
> >            THE SCIENTIFIC CASE FOR CREATION: 116 CATEGORIES OF EVIDENCE
> >
> >       I.  (Life Sciences): THE THEORY OF ORGANIC EVOLUTION IS INVALID.
> >
> >           A.  EVOLUTION* HAS NEVER BEEN OBSERVED.
> >
> >	etc . . .
> 
> Just out of curiosity - has CREATION ever been observed?
> I mean OBSERVED - not postulated from "faith" in a god or gods!

Has evolution? and I don't mean natural selection.
		Mike Johnston