Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version nyu B notes v1.5 12/10/84; site csd2.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!mcnc!philabs!cmcl2!csd2!dimitrov From: dimitrov@csd2.UUCP (Isaac Dimitrovsky) Newsgroups: net.origins Subject: Re: The Scientific Case for Creation: (Part 6) Message-ID: <3570015@csd2.UUCP> Date: Sat, 20-Apr-85 11:15:00 EST Article-I.D.: csd2.3570015 Posted: Sat Apr 20 11:15:00 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 22-Apr-85 06:59:44 EST References: <335@iham1.UUCP> Organization: New York University Lines: 38 [] >>> For example, if a limb were to evolve into a >>> wing, it would become a bad limb long before it became a >>> good wing. >> >> Try telling that to flying squirrels and see how far it gets you. > >Try asking them to really fly and see how far it gets you. What, do >you think they have "wings"? The point of the flying squirrel example is NOT that the squirrel can really fly. After all, if it could, you would just say it was an example of an animal with a fully developed wing. The point of the example is precisely that the squirrel can't fly. In other words, it may be useful to an animal to have a limb which is both a bad wing and a reasonably good limb. In other other words, at least in the case of wings, it is possible to have intermediate forms which are useful for gliding and short flights but are not capable of full flight. And, at least in this case, I don't think you can dispute that this point has been established. Can you? By the way, an interesting puzzle is to try and list all the different types of creatures that have some sort of flying ability. I come up with this probably incomplete list: 1. Birds. 2. Insects. 3. Flying Squirrel, Bat, etc. 4. Flying Fish. 5. Flying Frog. The neatest one of these has to be the flying frog. These critters have webbing on their feet which they can extend to allow them to glide when they jump. They were shown on The Living Planet, I can't remember what episode number. Isaac Dimitrovsky