Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!sdcsvax!dcdwest!ittvax!decvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-kirk!williams
From: williams@kirk.DEC (John Williams 223-3402)
Newsgroups: net.philosophy
Subject: Continuity
Message-ID: <1643@decwrl.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 12-Apr-85 11:38:10 EST
Article-I.D.: decwrl.1643
Posted: Fri Apr 12 11:38:10 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 14-Apr-85 03:44:21 EST
Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP
Organization: DEC Engineering Network
Lines: 28



	Excuse, please.

	The continuous model of the universe is the most relevent 
one. Physics are unable to resolve any sort of bottom most 
primitive particle. For all intents and purposes, the continuous 
model of the universe is the most accurate.

	If you are implying that there is an essentially random 
element to the universe, that is a model that Einstein himself 
refuted.

	" I find it very difficult to believe that God plays
dice " - Einstein ( loosely quoted )

	I do not consider it unreasonable to maintain some kind 
of consistency between physical theories and philosophical ones.
It is generally agreed that the uncertainties encountered in 
experimentation are due to observational difficulties. This was 
the point I wished to emphasize.

	We really are having trouble trying to find a limit to 
scale. A continuous function has no limit.

	This is what you might call a Strong Possibility.

						John.