Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site harvard.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!matthews
From: matthews@harvard.ARPA (Jim Matthews)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Why not here?
Message-ID: <40@harvard.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 15-Apr-85 14:35:23 EST
Article-I.D.: harvard.40
Posted: Mon Apr 15 14:35:23 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 18-Apr-85 04:20:04 EST
References: <123@ttrdc.UUCP> <550@abnji.UUCP>
Organization: Aiken Computation Laboratory, Harvard
Lines: 16

> Funny thing is, this is at least the second Soviet nuclear freeze
> in Europe since 20 Jan, 1981.  The first past without response
> from 1600 Penn Ave, I guess this one will as well.
> -- 
> Nyssa of Traken, now employed at Terminus Hospital, Inc.
> 				ihnp4!abnji!nyssa

	How about the U.S. nuclear freeze?  We haven't built a strategic
land-based system since 1971.  We haven't built a strategic bomber 
since 1962.  In fact, in both those areas we have destroyed weapons,
such as Titan IIs and older B-52s.  These "freezes" didn't pass without
response, however -- they were greeted with the SS-18, the SS-19, and
the Blackjack.

Jim Matthews
matthews@harvard