Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site peora.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!petsd!peora!jer
From: jer@peora.UUCP (J. Eric Roskos)
Newsgroups: net.rec.photo
Subject: Re: Darkroom neophyte knows nothing
Message-ID: <839@peora.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 18-Apr-85 08:59:19 EST
Article-I.D.: peora.839
Posted: Thu Apr 18 08:59:19 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 19-Apr-85 00:43:26 EST
References: <2720013@acf4.UUCP> <9667@brl-tgr.ARPA> <791@peora.UUCP> <391@tymix.UUCP>
Organization: Perkin-Elmer SDC, Orlando, Fl.
Lines: 15

>  As one who made about 100 8 x 10 prints from color negatives before
>  getting disgusted with the relatively low resolution of Kodacolor and
>  switched back to using Kodachrome and printing the occasional good
>  slide, I feel qualified to issue a partial rebuttal.

Oh, very well, you win.  No point in arguing further.  I use Kodak VPS
film, not Kodachrome, and use about 1 gallon of developer a month.  If you
do a sufficiently small volume of processing that your solutions "go sour"
before they are exhausted, the advantages I cited probably won't hold for
you.
-- 
Full-Name:  J. Eric Roskos
UUCP:       ..!{decvax,ucbvax,ihnp4}!vax135!petsd!peora!jer
US Mail:    MS 795; Perkin-Elmer SDC;
	    2486 Sand Lake Road, Orlando, FL 32809-7642