Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site vax135.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!gks
From: gks@vax135.UUCP (Ken Swanson)
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: Virgin Birth per duke!nlt
Message-ID: <1005@vax135.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 22-Apr-85 09:58:23 EST
Article-I.D.: vax135.1005
Posted: Mon Apr 22 09:58:23 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 23-Apr-85 06:22:46 EST
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel, NJ
Lines: 15

In reply to Eliyahu Teitz's question regarding the virgin birth of
Jesus Christ:

The virgin birth of Jesus Christ is claimed by a long-standing tradition
common to Catholicism, Protestantism and Ortodoxy; it is currently
disputed (as it has been through the centuries) by SOME Christians(?)
who obviously must not believe in the inspired and infallible
written word of God, the Bible.

Matt 1:18 (NAS) :
	Now the birth of Jesus Christ was as follows. When His mother
	Mary had been betrothed to Joseph, before they came together
	she was found to be with child by the Holy Spirit.

Also, see Luke 1:26-38 (especially verse 35).