Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site topaz.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!topaz!@RUTGERS.ARPA:jpa144@cit-vax
From: @RUTGERS.ARPA:jpa144@cit-vax
Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers
Subject: Star Wars
Message-ID: <1660@topaz.ARPA>
Date: Wed, 17-Apr-85 16:42:39 EST
Article-I.D.: topaz.1660
Posted: Wed Apr 17 16:42:39 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 18-Apr-85 07:59:42 EST
Sender: `¡@topaz.ARPA
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 23

From: jpa144@cit-vax (Jens Peter Alfke)

>> from jpa144@cit-vax (me) :
>> What do you all think of the Strategic [oops] Defense Initiative?

>  from Ron Singleton (rsingle@bbncct):
> JPA, I respectfully suggest this discussion should be in "net.armaments"
> or some other suitable vehicle.  It is not that the readers of this
> digest wouldn't be interested, just that the subject doesn't seem
> appropriate for the purposes of this digest as I understand it.

Mea Culpa.  You are indeed correct.  I still, however, have an interest
in how SF people feel about this topic, so let me rephrase:

If you have an opinion on the SDI, or an opinion about opinions on the
SDI, etc., feel free to send <ME> (not sf-lovers) a short note expressing
your feelings. (Try to keep it short: the file system I live on is getting
full!)  Afterwards, I might send a short summary to sf-lovers.  Mr.
Singleton and the others who wrote to me are correct: the discussion
should be kept off of this digest.

					--Peter Alfke (jpa144@cit-vax)
"We only wanted to be loved" --PiL