Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site topaz.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!topaz!@RUTGERS.ARPA:wallfesh%uconn.csnet@csnet-relay.arpa From: @RUTGERS.ARPA:wallfesh%uconn.csnet@csnet-relay.arpa Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers Subject: thinking computers Message-ID: <1711@topaz.ARPA> Date: Sun, 21-Apr-85 03:05:07 EST Article-I.D.: topaz.1711 Posted: Sun Apr 21 03:05:07 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 21-Apr-85 23:56:10 EST Sender: daemon@topaz.ARPA Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 11 From: Sande Wallfesh >Oh-Did I say "...computer thought...?", of course we all know that >computers don't think! Computers can be anthropomorphisised; a PDP here seems to have a will of its own. Also, does not cognition have computational components? La Metrie (sp?) said that 'man is a machine' and I think tha010011011 010010100111011001SYNTAX ERROR