Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site bu-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!bu-cs!root
From: root@bu-cs.UUCP (Barry Shein)
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: how universal is tar format? SYSV?
Message-ID: <353@bu-cs.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 15-Apr-85 20:28:57 EST
Article-I.D.: bu-cs.353
Posted: Mon Apr 15 20:28:57 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 18-Apr-85 23:52:04 EST
References: <9528@brl-tgr.ARPA>, <159@hadron.UUCP>
Organization: Boston Univ Comp. Sci.
Lines: 23

From: jsdy@hadron.UUCP (Joseph S. D. Yao)
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: how universal is tar format? SYSV?

>>                          ...   As a robustness note, even tho UCB puts
>> directory names on the tape SYSV just grumbles and ignores and finishes
>> fine.  Conversely, given a tape to read on a new system I would budget
>> more time if it were a cpio tape.
	[Me, btw]

>If you're creating a 4BSD tar tape for a USG or unspecified UNIX system,
>you should use the 'o' keyletter.  This says, omit those directories.
>	Joe Yao		hadron!jsdy@seismo.{ARPA,UUCP}

You are making the classic mistake, my original comments had more
to do with randomly created tapes falling in your lap (ie. *I*
didn't write them.) The whole point was mucho trouble with cpio tape
in at least one case (argh!! don't respond with ways to write portable
cpio tapes! this one was from AT&T, it was tooo late.) and very little
trouble with tar tapes. If you have control you can write a portable
EBCDIC tape with dd, as long as *you* read and *you* write it.

	-Barry Shein, Boston University