Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site hou2e.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!hao!hplabs!tektronix!uw-beaver!cornell!vax135!houxm!hou2e!pauldan
From: pauldan@hou2e.UUCP (P.SAUNDERS)
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: superturbochargers
Message-ID: <541@hou2e.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 12-Apr-85 15:12:46 EST
Article-I.D.: hou2e.541
Posted: Fri Apr 12 15:12:46 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 20-Apr-85 00:08:10 EST
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ
Lines: 12

Howdy, all you techno-experts!

I was recently involved in an argument concerning SUPERcharging versus
TURBOcharging.  Can I inspire anyone to discuss differences, inherent
advantages/disadvantages, which is "better", etc.?  Can anyone tell me
why all abnormally-aspirated F1 racers are of the turbo-sort, while most
"funny cars" are supercharged?

Thanks.

Dan Masi