Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83 v7 ucbtopaz-1.8; site ucbtopaz.CC.Berkeley.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!sdcsvax!dcdwest!ittvax!decvax!ucbvax!ucbtopaz!phoenix
From: phoenix@ucbtopaz.CC.Berkeley.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: air-horns in restaurants
Message-ID: <888@ucbtopaz.CC.Berkeley.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 11-Apr-85 06:54:49 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbtopaz.888
Posted: Thu Apr 11 06:54:49 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 14-Apr-85 02:28:30 EST
References: <1596@decwrl.UUCP>
Reply-To: phoenix@ucbtopaz.UUCP ()
Organization: Univ. of Calif., Berkeley CA USA
Lines: 26
Keywords: Reading, thinking....
Summary: Chabat charges w/o checking....


In article <1596@decwrl.UUCP> chabot@miles.DEC (L S Chabot) writes:
>ron vaughn  ==  >
>> one of these days when i have little rug-rats, i won't take them to
>> a nice restaurant (the kind where you are putting out some $$$$$) only
>> to watch everyone else *cringe* every time jr. lets out a yell.
>
>Ah, yes, the de rigueur net.flame attitude: you don't conform to my
>standards of decency, therefore I will violate them myself.  And in this
>case, there is no guarantee that you'll be inflicting loud children on
>anyone who would have inflicted them on you!  Very clever!  We see you
>actually do approve of screaming children, since you indicate your
>willingness to continue this practice!
>  

Uh.....Lisa?  I believe Ron said 'I *won't* take them to a nice restaurant...'
How about *reading* what someone has to say before flaming them, instead of
portraying an unthinking reactionary.  It might just save you a tad of
embaressment....
	Your reply to Melanie's article was solid, however - still reactionary,
but on the ball.  :-)

	
(Crises?...What Crises?)
John
phoenix@ucbtopaz