Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ucla-cs.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!trwrb!cepu!ucla-cs!srt
From: srt@ucla-cs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.flame,net.religion,net.philosophy
Subject: Re: Another small question.
Message-ID: <4913@ucla-cs.ARPA>
Date: Sat, 20-Apr-85 19:22:09 EST
Article-I.D.: ucla-cs.4913
Posted: Sat Apr 20 19:22:09 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 23-Apr-85 06:22:09 EST
References: <1521@decwrl.UUCP> <5426@utzoo.UUCP> <736@mhuxt.UUCP> <5449@utzoo.UUCP> <259@h-sc1.UUCP> <5466@utzoo.UUCP>
Reply-To: srt@ucla-cs.UUCP (Scott Turner)
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department
Lines: 13
Xref: watmath net.flame:9445 net.religion:6720 net.philosophy:1705
Summary: 

In article <5466@utzoo.UUCP> laura@utzoo.UUCP (Laura Creighton) writes:
>
>...Stuck on a
>life raft I have to decide whether it is necessary for me to eat
>Jeff to survive...
>

Which goes to show that you can't base a philosophy on consequences, since
there is no way to decide whether or not it is necessary to eat Jeff to
survive.


						-- Scott