Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site kontron.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!pesnta!pertec!kontron!cramer
From: cramer@kontron.UUCP (Clayton Cramer)
Newsgroups: net.politics,net.flame,net.legal
Subject: Re: Personal Defenses
Message-ID: <118@kontron.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 24-Apr-85 13:29:57 EST
Article-I.D.: kontron.118
Posted: Wed Apr 24 13:29:57 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 25-Apr-85 08:35:15 EST
References: <1518@decwrl.UUCP> <420@utai.UUCP> <539@ihu1h.UUCP> <188@spar.UUCP>
Organization: Kontron Electronics, Irvine, CA
Lines: 16
Xref: watmath net.politics:8666 net.flame:9501 net.legal:1603

> > I think the point of whether it is good or not good to carry personal
> > defense weapons (unconcealed) is moot when compared with the fact that if I
> > WANT to and am not violating someone else's personal rights, I should be
> > able to. I think that says it all.
> > 					Jay Mitchell
> 
> The trouble is that some people feel they have a personal right not to
> be faced with an implicit threat of armed force.
> 
> 					Baba

Some people feel they have a personal right not be faced by homosexuals. 
Some people feel they have a personal right to not live in the same society
with atheists.  Baba seems to have the Moral Majority mentality, the view
that non-aggressive actions are an appropriate area for intervention by 
others.