Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site plus5.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!plus5!hokey
From: hokey@plus5.UUCP (Hokey)
Newsgroups: net.mail
Subject: Re: Yet another Sendmail problem
Message-ID: <699@plus5.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 22-Apr-85 16:22:00 EST
Article-I.D.: plus5.699
Posted: Mon Apr 22 16:22:00 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 23-Apr-85 07:12:27 EST
References: <535@spp2.UUCP> <749@ihnp4.UUCP> <200@stc-a.UUCP>
Reply-To: hokey@plus5.UUCP (Hokey)
Organization: Plus Five Computer Services, St. Louis MO
Lines: 17

Well, it sort of works for us.  If we use the trick on our Mlocal mailer,
replies go to "uucp" instead of to the author.  It seems to work on
relayed mail, though.

Another interesting case comes when we attempt to fully qualify names in
the ruleset.  This works, however it *always* causes a "remote from" UUCP
line to be generated.

I can understand that sendmail assumes the mailer will do the conversion
to the target protocol (with the exception of UUCP mail, which sendmail
tries to account for itself), but I am all set to hack sendmail into
doing the conversion directly.  It would be equally swell if sendmail
directly handled the incoming conversion as well, instead of relying on
rmail (for example).  This is kinda hard.
-- 
Hokey           ..ihnp4!plus5!hokey
		  314-725-9492