Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site spp1.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwspp!spp1!johnston
From: johnston@spp1.UUCP (Micheal L. Johnston)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Why Creation?
Message-ID: <190@spp1.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 17-Apr-85 11:43:11 EST
Article-I.D.: spp1.190
Posted: Wed Apr 17 11:43:11 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 21-Apr-85 00:07:26 EST
References: <14600006@hpfcrs.UUCP> <525@cadovax.UUCP>, <184@spp1.UUCP> <530@cadovax.UUCP>
Organization: TRW, Redondo Beach  CA
Lines: 37

> If what you say
> is true, and both postulated origins theories are religious in nature
> and do not belong in the public schools.

I didn't say that. Conclude what you will. Whether Evolution and
Creationism or both taught or both excluded is another matter. I don't
like the fact that there is a bias.

> What is the definition of proof?  Most evolutionary scientists state
> that evolution has been proved.

Why have you been keeping this from? Are you a suspense novelist on the
side? Please produce the proof and of course the definition of evolution
it proves.

> >                                    ..... I honestly believe, if you have
> > another idea on how everything came to be, and if you get a movement
> > behind, produce textbooks and teaching aids, you should be able to present
> > your views in the school system.
> 
> I see.  So school science should be politically dictated by non-scientists?
> If I can gain enough political momentum I can cause school teachers to
> teach that the earth is flat, or 6000 years old, or was created yesterday
> etc.?  Science by propaganda campaign, WONDERFUL.
> (what about the separation of laboratory and state? :-)
> 
> 
> Keith Doyle
> #  {ucbvax,ihnp4,decvax}!trwrb!cadovax!keithd

Why would you define someone who comes up with another origins theory a
non-scientist. If science decides to base line everything it currently
accepts and define anything new as non-science then I think we've just
heard the death knell for true science.


		MIke Johnston