Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site hao.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!hao!ward From: ward@hao.UUCP (Mike Ward) Newsgroups: net.origins Subject: Re: Ethics 'n Stuff Message-ID: <1481@hao.UUCP> Date: Sun, 21-Apr-85 01:04:53 EST Article-I.D.: hao.1481 Posted: Sun Apr 21 01:04:53 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 23-Apr-85 00:31:13 EST References: <945@uwmacc.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: High Altitude Obs./NCAR, Boulder CO Lines: 28 > (As an illustration of the poor job evolutionists do of transmitting > information about their work, consider that the first place I learned > of punctuated equilibrium was in an ICR publication! One might > hypothesize that I only read creationist literature, but I don't. I > read very little of it, actually.) I, too, first heard of punctuated equilibrium from a creatonist - in this newsgroup, as a matter of fact. But all I needed was the name "Gould", and I have found little difficulty in continuing my education. I have spoken to several high school students about this subject lately, and none of them have heard of Steven Gould or punctuated equilibrium or creationism. The task of educating our citizens does not lie with the creationists or the scientists. It lies with the school systems. Unfortunately. Scientists tend to do a very good job of transmiting information about their work to other scientists. They tend to do a poor job of transmiting this information to the public. This is usually left to news reporters and textbook writers. Reporters never seem to understand, whatever it is they are writing about. Textbook writers seem to be at least twenty years behind whatever field they are writing about.. What all this means is that for a discussion to be meaningful, a great deal of education is needed on both sides. Both sides should be engaging in this education. A good place to start is right here. How about it - where's that exposition of the theories of creation that we've been waiting for?