Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/3/84; site enmasse.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!mhuxm!mhuxi!mhuxh!mhuxv!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!panda!enmasse!mroddy
From: mroddy@enmasse.UUCP (Mark Roddy)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Nicaraguan Self-determination (question for Matthews)
Message-ID: <392@enmasse.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 17-Apr-85 08:55:07 EST
Article-I.D.: enmasse.392
Posted: Wed Apr 17 08:55:07 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 19-Apr-85 00:29:24 EST
References: <129@ttrdc.UUCP> <39@harvard.ARPA>
Organization: Enmasse Computer Corp., Acton, Mass.
Lines: 25

> 
> Governments, such as the U.S.S.R., Cuba, and  
> Nicaragua, which pursue revolutionary foreign policies are by choice
> outside the realm of international law and its corresponding "rights."

Geez, even Ronny has dropped the 'we're just stopping the nicker-rawguians
from making revolution in el salvador' crap. There just wasn't any proof
that the events in salvador were being directed from managua.

I think that the U.N. charter prohibits interventionist foreign policy
of any ideology, not just left-imperialism. Many of the world powers
violate international laws, in this respect we have a world community
of outlaws. It ain't restricted to the commies.

> 	As for elections, I suppose they could be fair but I've yet
> to hear of Marxist-Leninist success in an election commonly regarded
> as fair.  

Obviously you forgot Allende of Chile.
-- 
						Mark Roddy
						Net working,
						Just reading the news.

					(harvard!talcott!panda!enmasse!mroddy)