Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Denver Mods 7/26/84) 6/24/83; site drutx.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ahuta!drutx!slb
From: slb@drutx.UUCP (Sue Brezden)
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: Virgin birth
Message-ID: <2592@drutx.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 24-Apr-85 09:59:10 EST
Article-I.D.: drutx.2592
Posted: Wed Apr 24 09:59:10 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 25-Apr-85 04:01:56 EST
Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Denver
Lines: 30

Dan writes:

> I am only aware of two different views. The Roman Catholic theology
>  states that both Jesus and Mary were virgin born.

NO, NO, NO.  I am a Buddhist, and _I_ know better than that.  The
doctrine of the Immaculate Conception has nothing to do with the
doctrine of the Virgin Birth.

The Catholic view is that Mary was born without original sin--her
mother was not a virgin.

Before you start condemning people's views as non-scriptural, be 
sure you know what those views are.



-- 

                                     Sue Brezden
                                     
Real World: Room 1B17                Net World: ihnp4!drutx!slb
            AT&T Information Systems
            11900 North Pecos
            Westminster, Co. 80234
            (303)538-3829 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                    Honk if you love Shiva!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~