Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site randvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!randvax!edhall
From: edhall@randvax.UUCP (Ed Hall)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Euthanasia
Message-ID: <2433@randvax.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 21-Apr-85 13:35:19 EST
Article-I.D.: randvax.2433
Posted: Sun Apr 21 13:35:19 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 25-Apr-85 03:36:10 EST
References: <1544@decwrl.UUCP> <2397@randvax.UUCP> <971@vax1.fluke.UUCP> <907@pyuxd.UUCP>
Organization: Rand Corp., Santa Monica
Lines: 34

> > >Chuq, if you're listening, I take it all back.  I was miffed when you
> > >took action the last time this Williams character became obnoxious.
> > >
> > >I've changed my mind.
> > >
> > >		-Ed
> > 
> > I'm with Ed.			Peter B
> 
> I've changed my mind, too.  But in a somewhat opposite way.  After seeing some
> of the articles from Williams, I was tempted to chalk it up to "more of the
> same" from him.  But after reading his articles on what he called
> "egocentricity" not being a reasonable basis for scientific study, and on
> how some people deliberately reject such study in favor of their own
> perceptions (and preconceptions) being labelled as "reality", I found a
> surprise:  a man who may at times speak like an Arndt, but one who really
> has something to say.
> ....
>                    Rich Rosen   pyuxd!rlr

I noticed this insight on John William's part, too.  It's just that his
postings show more egocentricity and closed-mindedness than Sunny's
ever did.

Posting, for all of the Networld to see, articles that essentially
tell one of the net community to go kill herself, ARE SIMPLY
INEXCUSABLE.  No if's, and's, or but's.  You, as much as anyone,
should be aware of the dangers of condoning such actions.

I don't care if Mr. Williams posted the Unified Field Theory and a
cure for cancer.  It doesn't justify what he did.

		-Ed Hall
		decvax!randvax!edhall