Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site uw-beaver Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!laser-lovers From: laser-lovers@uw-beaver Newsgroups: fa.laser-lovers Subject: Re: Re: Hershey fonts public domain? Message-ID: <1104@uw-beaver> Date: Mon, 29-Apr-85 02:41:45 EDT Article-I.D.: uw-beave.1104 Posted: Mon Apr 29 02:41:45 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 30-Apr-85 05:23:27 EDT Sender: daemon@uw-beaver Organization: U of Washington Computer Science Lines: 29 From: tektronix!hp-pcd!hplabs!sdcrdcf!rdcf.sdc.uucp!darrelj@uw-beaver.arpa To clarify on the lack of Hershey copyright: it was published in April 1976. At that time it was necessary to assert copyright on published versions for it to be retained. Both the NBS report itself and NTIS are publications within the (old) law. There are NO notices. Further, the tone of the forward is that of scientists freely diseminating useful discoveries. Registration is not particularly an issue, even under the old law it was possible to have copyright without it, just a harder time in court. Darrel J. Van Buer, PhD System Development Corp. 2500 Colorado Ave Santa Monica, CA 90406 (213)820-4111 x5449 ...{allegra,burdvax,cbosgd,hplabs,ihnp4,orstcs,sdcsvax,ucla-cs,akgua} !sdcrdcf!darrelj VANBUER@USC-ECL.ARPA [[Editor's note: I've seen similar copyright-related discussions on a number of other groups and so I believe the issues here have been well hashed over already. I will not forward additional messages concerning this to the list unless they are particularly comprehensive or in some other way of general use (i.e., if, for example, a copyright lawyer were to submit a message, I'd probably forward it). I believe that the copyright law is probably not applicable in this instance, anyway, as Hershey's work was done for a U.S. Government agency and in most such cases, I believe, policy is that the the work is not copyrighted. --Rick ]]