Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site boulder.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!hao!nbires!boulder!heuring
From: heuring@boulder.UUCP (Vincent Heuring)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Bose 901's; Acoustats.
Message-ID: <350@boulder.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 24-Apr-85 17:20:27 EST
Article-I.D.: boulder.350
Posted: Wed Apr 24 17:20:27 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 27-Apr-85 01:06:03 EST
References: <140@omen.UUCP> <moncol.260>
Reply-To: heuring@boulder.UUCP (Vincent Heuring)
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Lines: 24


Well, I held off as long as I could, but what the heck - why not
jump into the Bose 901 fray. I am a former owner of a pair of 901's,
purchased in the early 70's. When I got them, I loved them, and
loved to defend them with passion against the attacks (comb filters,
muddy sound, etc. etc.). Ready to move up, I sold them last night
to a guy from csu, and dragged up an old pair of Dynaco A-25's
that have been doing service in the basement at parties, etc.

Put on pf's Wish You Were Here (CD, Yamaha CDX-1), and couldn't
believe my ears. The Dynacos had a clarity and inner detail that
were immediately and obviously noticeable. Images were much more
solid, and the sound stage was *THERE*. I must admit,  the old
Boses sure could handle the power, and they sound good when you
'crank it up.' Anyway, what an eye-opener.

Now for a question. Has anyone out there had experience with
Acoustat speakers? I am interested in the entire line. Prices,
reliablilty, amplifier compatibility, etc. Reply via net mail,
and I will summarize.

				V. Heuring