Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site aluxz.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!aluxz!mrh
From: mrh@aluxz.UUCP (HUDOCK)
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: Bags and Belts
Message-ID: <245@aluxz.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 30-Apr-85 08:02:02 EDT
Article-I.D.: aluxz.245
Posted: Tue Apr 30 08:02:02 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 1-May-85 03:16:50 EDT
References: <911@eisx.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Allentown, PA
Lines: 15

> The issue of what laws the government should (or shouldn't) pass
> to protect us from ourselves is a bigger issue than just
> seatbelts.  We can argue the larger question, but Uncle
> has so far been unshakeable in the position that the people
> WILL BE PROTECTED.  The only choice that we have any hope
> of making for ourselves is HOW.  The options:  seatbelts
> or airbags.
> 

  I agree Jim, so many people out there in netland believe the
  govt. should protect us from the "ERECTION TO THE RESSURECTION"
  
  I dont believe HOW to be our only choice. Had people only asked
  HOW in TJ's days, the HORSE BELT LAW would have passed in the
  continental congress.