Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site nmtvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!lanl!unmvax!unm-cvax!nmtvax!maurice
From: maurice@nmtvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: Home Defense
Message-ID: <424@nmtvax.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 21-Apr-85 23:08:21 EDT
Article-I.D.: nmtvax.424
Posted: Sun Apr 21 23:08:21 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 28-Apr-85 07:21:38 EDT
References: <>
Reply-To: maurice@nmtvax.UUCP (Roger M. Levasseur)
Distribution: net
Organization: NMT Tractor Beam Cloud Research Center
Lines: 18
Summary: 

>Speaking of guns, is there any agreement out there on the optimal
>selection of firearms for home defense?  I myself prefer the
>HK-91 heavy assault rifle for shooting at intruders who are in cars,
>jeeps or behind brick walls; the HK-94 submachine gun for sneaking
>around in the backyard grove; the Remington 870 Brushmaster 12-gauge 
>in combat configuration for close-quarters arguments; and the Weatherby
>Fibermark Mark V .340 WM for sniping around the backyard at those 1000yd
>ranges.  I however have not yet been able to decide on the optimal
>handgun to carry to amuse myself.  Semi-auto or revolver?  Big/little?
>
>Any ideas?

    What about cluster bombs and shoulder fired heat seeking missles.
These would be great additions for personal and home defense. But if you
really want a handgun to amuse yourself, how about the .44 mag ("missle 
launcher" :-) ) that dirty harry packs.

           roger