Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site gitpyr.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!gatech!gitpyr!mag From: mag@gitpyr.UUCP (Mark A. Gravitt) Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Re: Coke changes recipe Message-ID: <364@gitpyr.UUCP> Date: Thu, 2-May-85 19:58:52 EDT Article-I.D.: gitpyr.364 Posted: Thu May 2 19:58:52 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 4-May-85 00:52:24 EDT References: <1210@amdcad.UUCP> Reply-To: mag@gitpyr.UUCP (Mark A. Gravitt) Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology Lines: 32 Keywords: yuuch! In article <1210@amdcad.UUCP> mike@amdcad.UUCP (Mike Parker) writes: >What no flames about the Coke recipe change? > >Rumor has it that the stuff tastes alot like Pepsi, > Well, I can only speak for myself, but frankly I think that Coke has made a *BIG* mistake in changing the recipe. I tried the new stuff (deliberate word choice) when it infected the machine in our computer center. The flavor reminded me of the time that I had been working with dry Portland cement and tried to wash the dust out of my mouth with a Pepsi. (Being an Atlanta area native, Pepsi used to be my last resort amongst soft drinks... :-) ) To me, the new "Coke" is slightly sweeter (the old Coke was almost TOO sweet for me anyway!) and has an unpleasantly lime-ish (the stone, not the citrus fruit) taste. Oh well, at least the recipe change has shortened my grocery list... :-) (Hmmm, I suppose that my .signature doesn't really fit this message...) -- Mark A. Gravitt | "You, therefore, love one User Assistant | another and in patient Office of Computing Services | endurance conceal one Georgia Institute of Technology | another's shortcomings." Atlanta, GA | [Testament of Joseph 17:2] ..!{akgua, allegra, amd, hplabs, ihnp4, masscomp, ut-ngp}gatech!gitpyr!mag ..!{rlgvax, sb1, uf-cgrl, unmvax, ut-sally}!gatech!gitpyr!mag