Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site hammer.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!orca!hammer!seifert
From: seifert@hammer.UUCP (Snoopy)
Newsgroups: net.micro
Subject: Re: Followup: AT's WE32100 Miroprocessor
Message-ID: <1235@hammer.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 5-May-85 14:38:28 EDT
Article-I.D.: hammer.1235
Posted: Sun May  5 14:38:28 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 7-May-85 22:32:54 EDT
References: <720@houxl.UUCP>
Reply-To: seifert@hammer.UUCP (Snoopy)
Organization: The Daisy Hill Puppy Farm
Lines: 13
Summary: 

In article <720@houxl.UUCP> mlh@houxl.UUCP (M.HARRISON) writes:
>  Well, its AT&T's policy not to reveal the names of its customers

When did *this* policy start?  Why does it cost extra to get an
unlisted number?  (Don't tell me that AT&T != the operating companies
anymore, this policy started *before* 1/1/84)

>For those who sent resumes, thanks.  And yes, we are hiring
>(watch net.jobs).

So soon after laying off 11,000 people?

<flame off>