Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site ssc-vax.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!zadco From: zadco@ssc-vax.UUCP (Rick Fairfield) Newsgroups: net.micro.cpm Subject: Summary of CP/M C compiler suggestions Message-ID: <704@ssc-vax.UUCP> Date: Mon, 6-May-85 13:23:18 EDT Article-I.D.: ssc-vax.704 Posted: Mon May 6 13:23:18 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 8-May-85 02:44:45 EDT Distribution: net Organization: Boeing Aerospace Co., Seattle, WA Lines: 39 May 6, 1985 I received many replies to my request for a better CP/M C compiler than Whitesmiths. Everyone agrees that Whi- tesmiths C Compiler is a dog. How can they get away with selling such trash at such a high price (about $700.00) - is the market asleep?. Anyway, here is a summary of what I learned: 1) The nearly unanimous favorite was the Aztec 'C' com- piler from Manx Software. This compiler costs about $200.00. The Aztec C compiler was liked because of its similarity to the 4.2 bsd Unix C compiler, because it includes source code for the library, and because of it has pretty good compila- tion speed. However, a common complaint was that the code generated is not very efficient, making for rather long pro- gram files. Since I am writing large programs this may be a problem for me. 2) There are a number of inexpensive C compilers (under $100.00), all of which appear to produce efficient code and sport fast compilation times. These compilers suffered from varying degrees of "non-standardness". The BDS C compiler was the most well liked in this class. 3) Several people mentioned the Eco-Soft C compiler as being the most modern, standard, and complete CP/M implemen- tation. However, none of these people had actually used the compiler; all were reporting second hand information. If anyone has any hands-on experience with this compiler I'd like to hear from you. Thanx, zzzzzadco aka Rick Fairfield Boeing Aerospace Co 206-773-1004