Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ucla-cs.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwrba!cepu!ucla-cs!reiher From: reiher@ucla-cs.UUCP Newsgroups: net.movies Subject: Re: Eraserhead Message-ID: <5166@ucla-cs.ARPA> Date: Thu, 2-May-85 03:44:58 EDT Article-I.D.: ucla-cs.5166 Posted: Thu May 2 03:44:58 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 5-May-85 02:14:11 EDT References: <1911@decwrl.UUCP> Reply-To: reiher@ucla-cs.UUCP (Peter Reiher) Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Lines: 37 Summary: In article <1911@decwrl.UUCP> dross@vlnvax.DEC writes: > > Can anyone offer explanation as to the reasoning behind the making >of "Eraserhead"? I rented it this weekend and was unimpressed, disappointed, >and confused. Why would anyone PAY to have this movie made? "Eraseehead" was made on grant money from a variety of sources. I have seen much stranger and less interesting films made from grant money. >It does not >entertain, inform, stimulate the brain, or evoke any emotion. I find it to >be more offensive than the slasher/T&A/Smokey and the Car Chase offerings >because it doesn't seem to address itself to ANY audience... Did I miss >something? Well, yes, you did miss something. "Eraserhead" is advertised as "A dream of dark and troubling things." I don't claim to understand it, but I certainly did find it troubling. The imagery is fascinating (to me and a few others, at least) and the exercise of trying to follow the plot is reminiscent of reconstructing my dreams the day after. I can identify certain major plot points, but weird and unexplainable things intrude, and the overall motivations and meanings are obscure. I will readily admit that enjoyment of this sort of experience is very much a matter of taste. I'm not sure if I can honestly say that "Eraserhead" entertained me in the more conventional meaning of the word, and it certainly didn't inform me, but it did stimulate me (even at midnight, which is when I saw it) and it did evoke several emotions. > > If anyone can explain any of the following, I would appreciate it : I read an interview with David Lynch in which he said that there was no explanation for much of the imagery in "Eraserhead". Attempting to fit it all into a neat package is futile. -- Peter Reiher reiher@ucla-cs.arpa {...ihnp4,ucbvax,sdcrdcf}!ucla-cs!reiher