Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site olivee.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!hao!hplabs!oliveb!olivee!greg From: greg@olivee.UUCP (Greg Paley) Newsgroups: net.music.classical Subject: Re: Andrew Lloyd Webber's 'Requiem' Message-ID: <331@olivee.UUCP> Date: Wed, 24-Apr-85 12:45:07 EST Article-I.D.: olivee.331 Posted: Wed Apr 24 12:45:07 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 27-Apr-85 01:40:25 EST References: <353@ptsfc.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: Olivetti ATC; Cupertino, Ca Lines: 51 > > It's a fascinating piece, very dramatic and often quite moving. > Domingo's part is the least interesting of the soloists', but > he sings beautifully, although his Spanish-accented Latin is > rather exotic in comparison with everyone else. Sarah Brightman > is magnificent - her part is fiendishly difficult in places - > and the boy sings like an angel. > I had missed the original telecast, and finally saw a repeat last night (Apr. 23). I deliberately avoided reading any reviews before hearing it. I gave up on it about half way through. There was no original music in it. No, a composer shouldn't be prevented from even attempting a "Requiem" just because he can't match the level of Mozart, Verdi, Berlioz, etc. However, he should have something of his own to say on the subject. This particular work seemed to me blatantly derivative of the work of other composers, specifically Orff and Britten, with other "borrowings" from the Italian verismo school. I wouldn't mind if someone took thematic material from others and fashioned them into a coherent statement that could, itself, stand as a separate work of art. What I heard in this case was a mishmash of styles that never cooperated to make a statement. Domingo's Latin was not Spanish-accented. It was classic "church Latin" of the Roman school (as opposed to the German tradition) which approximates contemporary Italian pronunciation. I suspect that Brightman's voice has a freak high register which makes this music relatively easy for her and would make it nearly impossible for most other sopranos. Her middle register was tremulous and unsteady, the low register nonexistent. The part seemed written to capitalize on her unusual top notes. Nonetheless, "fiendishly difficult" as it may sound, the insistent hammering away at the top octave is poor vocal writing, creating a sense of monotony and aural fatigue (even if the singer can handle it) and making verbal definition impossible. If this had been a new text, I would defy anyone to understand what was being sung from listening to her. Domingo was also strained by passages that required him to scream insistently at the top of his range, but the steadiness of his vocal production in other sections contrasted badly with the unevenness in Brightman's. I surmise from articles posted that many critics did hatchet jobs on the work. My own irritation on hearing the talents of Maazel, Domingo, etc. wasted on something of this caliber was heightened by the knowledge of how difficult (and politically involved) it generally is to get a new work performed at all. - Greg Paley