Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site alice.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!alice!ark
From: ark@alice.UUCP (Andrew Koenig)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: What is this thing called life?
Message-ID: <3674@alice.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 30-Apr-85 13:23:52 EDT
Article-I.D.: alice.3674
Posted: Tue Apr 30 13:23:52 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 1-May-85 03:47:42 EDT
References: <993@uwmacc.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Labs, Murray Hill
Lines: 9

Paul DuBois says:

> Evolutionists claim that they do not have to account for the origin
> of the matter from which life arose.  Why then should creationists have
> to account for the origin of the creator from which life arose?

Answer: If you claim that a creator must exist because life could
not have arisen by itself, you must explain why your hypothetical
creator could have been self-generated and life could not.