Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site scgvaxd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!pesnta!pertec!scgvaxd!dan
From: dan@scgvaxd.UUCP (Dan Boskovich)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: The Scientific Case For Creationism (Part n)
Message-ID: <303@scgvaxd.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 3-May-85 21:42:43 EDT
Article-I.D.: scgvaxd.303
Posted: Fri May  3 21:42:43 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 5-May-85 03:56:56 EDT
References: <253@cmu-cs-edu1.ARPA>
Reply-To: dan@scgvaxd.UUCP (Dan Boskovich)
Organization: Hughes Aircraft Co., El Segundo, CA
Lines: 59
Summary: 

In article <253@cmu-cs-edu1.ARPA> rafferty@cmu-cs-edu1.ARPA (Colin Rafferty) writes:
>
>I want to hear, from *anybody*, *any* kind of evidence for Creationism.  In
>fact, I would be happy just to hear *why* somebody believes in it.
>
>The lines are open and operators are standing by right now.
>
>----
>            Colin Rafferty { Math Department, Carnegie-Mellon University }

  Apparently, you didn't see this posting!

>To follow this up, let me issue this challenge to all of you creationists
>out there:  Give me some POSITIVE evidence of creationism that is not
>out of the Bible.  All that I've seen so far has been negative evidence
>in an effort to debunk evolution, while the evolutionists have been 
>supplying positive evidence.  Please, give me some facts supporting
>creationism, or move this discussion to another net( net.religion 
>sounds appropriate to me)
>Thanks in advance
>Dave Fritzinger
>Public Health Research Institute(phri)

 "Design" is evidence of a "Designer"!

 Before you say there is no evidence of design, first read what
 Darwin himself had to say concerning the "eye"!

 Biological clocks, electro-dynamic fields, DNA (bulding blocks),
 all are evidence of "design".

 Anyone with open eyes will see design when he looks at the world.
 It would a waste of time and space to give the numerous examples
 of design in our world.

 More positive evidence for creation is in the Second Law! The universe
 is running down. It can't be running down forever. Somewhere it must
 have been wound up; a starting point.
 Evolutionists say the Second Law does not apply to the earth because
 it is an open system. However the universe is a closed system. Given
 this, how could it have started in the first place. Before Evolution
 could have started on earth, it first had to produce earth, in a closed
 system; The Universe!
 Big Bang - No, Explosions cause disorder not order.
 Steady State - No, its running down!! Its not steady!!
 Creation - Definite beginning, design, order, running down, hmmm, seems
 to fit my origins theory!

 Darwinism is on its way out! If you don't think so, you are not up
 on current Evolution theory. Punctuationism is whats happening and this
 is just as much magic as you say Creation is. What is the difference
 between God creating Adam, and a reptile giving birth to a bird?

 Please, some evidence for P.E. if you will!


						Dan

"Darwinism is dead"