Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site hao.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!hao!ward
From: ward@hao.UUCP (Mike Ward)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: What is this thing called life?
Message-ID: <1514@hao.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 5-May-85 10:14:12 EDT
Article-I.D.: hao.1514
Posted: Sun May  5 10:14:12 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 7-May-85 07:16:05 EDT
References: <993@uwmacc.UUCP> <3674@alice.UUCP> <301@scgvaxd.UUCP>
Organization: High Altitude Obs./NCAR, Boulder CO
Lines: 8

>  Creation science
>  is the scientific evidence for a creation, not a creator.

Even if we accept that one can scientifically discuss a creation
without talking about the creator, there is no creation science.
Why?  because there is no evidence for a creation.
It has been well demonstrated here that the only thing the creationists 
have is outdated theology and outdated philosophy.  No science at all.