Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site utastro.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!ut-sally!utastro!padraig
From: padraig@utastro.UUCP (Padraig Houlahan)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: On Natural Selection
Message-ID: <51@utastro.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 5-May-85 11:47:51 EDT
Article-I.D.: utastro.51
Posted: Sun May  5 11:47:51 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 7-May-85 07:19:32 EDT
References: <1485@hao.UUCP> <If> <on> <the> <other> <hand> <213@phri.UUCP> <298@scgvaxd.UUCP> <1037@ihuxn.UUCP> <302@scgvaxd.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: U. Texas, Astronomy, Austin, TX
Lines: 20

> In article <1037@ihuxn.UUCP> jho@ihuxn.UUCP (Yosi Hoshen) writes:
> [Dan] >>  "Design" is evidence of a "Designer"!
> >Why assume that for a design there is a single designer?  There could
> >be many designers for a design.
> 
>   I agree! Thats why I have said three times before on the net that
>   creation science is not concerned with naming a creator. It is just
>   the scientific evidence for a "creation" as opposed to a purely
>   naturalistic evolutionary origin.

Hey! Surprise us. Give us some of this scientific evidence.

>  Why do you say that ice is more ordered than liquid water?
> 
> 				       Dan

Because it is less random; the molecules are not free to wander around
to the same extent that they can in a liquid.

Padraig Houlahan