Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site hao.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!hao!ward
From: ward@hao.UUCP (Mike Ward)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: The Scientific Case For Creationism (Part n)
Message-ID: <1518@hao.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 5-May-85 19:17:36 EDT
Article-I.D.: hao.1518
Posted: Sun May  5 19:17:36 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 7-May-85 21:23:11 EDT
References: <253@cmu-cs-edu1.ARPA> <303@scgvaxd.UUCP>
Organization: High Altitude Obs./NCAR, Boulder CO
Lines: 13

>   Apparently, you didn't see this posting!
> 
> 
>  "Design" is evidence of a "Designer"!
> 
You can post garbage a thousand times, but it remains garbage,
not evidence.  "Design is evidence of a designer" is not evidence,
it is a philosophical presumption.  If you could prove that presumption
(a truly remarkable feat that would be....nobody has been able
to do it yet), then you might have something going.

As of now, there has been no evidence for creation posted to
this discussion group.