Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site aecom.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!aecom!berger
From: berger@aecom.UUCP (Mitchell Berger)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Innocent Question
Message-ID: <1534@aecom.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 7-May-85 10:01:39 EDT
Article-I.D.: aecom.1534
Posted: Tue May  7 10:01:39 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 9-May-85 00:17:03 EDT
Distribution: net
Organization: Yeshiva University
Lines: 17

*** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MESSAGE ***
This is an innocent question, not intended to be an attack.
So give me an answer, not a defence.

I was just wonderin'... If evolution happened in abrupt
changes, wouldn't two animals have to undergo the same
(or a similar) change? I mean, if in each step the new
species can't breed with the old, we would need two of
the new species in order to get something started. 
What's the chance that there are two animals, 1 male and
female, within the general vicinity (close enough so that
they could find eachother), undergo the same drastic change
in the same generation?
-- 
Micha Berger
2525 Amsterdam Ave. Suite M406  NY, NY 10033     (212) 781-0756
{philabs|cucard|pegasus|rocky2}!aecom!berger