Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site cmu-cs-edu1.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!rochester!cmu-cs-pt!cmu-cs-edu1!rafferty
From: rafferty@cmu-cs-edu1.ARPA (Colin Rafferty)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Evidence, gentlemen.  Not mysticism.
Message-ID: <271@cmu-cs-edu1.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 6-May-85 20:57:40 EDT
Article-I.D.: cmu-cs-e.271
Posted: Mon May  6 20:57:40 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 9-May-85 02:28:55 EDT
Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, CS/RI
Lines: 19


>[Dan Boskovich]
>
>  "Design" is evidence of a "Designer"!
> 

As has been said before, that is not a scientific proof.  

What I want is a scientific PROOF of Creationism.  Or even a semi-scientific
plea for Creationism.  What I don't want is some mystical gobbly-gook about
"Design".  From anybody, not just Dan.

----
            Colin Rafferty { Math Department, Carnegie-Mellon University }

"According to convention there is a sweet and a bitter, a hot and a cold,
and according to convention, there is an order.  In truth, there are atoms
and a void."
                -Democritus(400 B.C.)