Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site spar.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!decwrl!spar!baba
From: baba@spar.UUCP (Baba ROM DOS)
Newsgroups: net.politics.theory,net.politics
Subject: Re: Libertarian Arguments -- Reply**3 to Baba
Message-ID: <216@spar.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 26-Apr-85 16:44:55 EDT
Article-I.D.: spar.216
Posted: Fri Apr 26 16:44:55 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 28-Apr-85 23:30:28 EDT
References: <1087@ratex.UUCP>
Organization: Schlumberger Palo Alto Research, CA
Lines: 35
Xref: watmath net.politics.theory:620 net.politics:8733

> >>>I seem to recall that one of the examples of ludicrous straw men given 
> >>>by DKMcK was in fact a proposition put forward by a self-proclaimed 
> >>>libertarian several weeks earlier.
> >>
> >>  1) Rather than seeming to recall, why doesn't Baba give us a concrete
> >>example?
> >
> >Quite simply, spar doesn't have enough disk space to archive more than a
> >couple of weeks worth of news.  Both your article and the one it put
> >me in mind of are lost under the rainbow.  If you would care to mail
> >me a copy of your article, I'll be happy to tell you which example 
> >I was referring to.
> 
> Wonderful!  Baba makes an assertion which he cannot substantiate, and the
> truth of which I question, and then asks him that I send him the proof.  If
> I knew of an article which proved his accusation, I wouldn't have challenged
> it in the first place.  I find his request extremely bizarre!

If you would take the time to read my postings before replying, you might
notice a few little things that seem to escape your attention.  Like the
fact that I was requesting a copy of *YOUR* article.  

(In the referenced article, I caught Dan'l in yet another attempt at libel.)
> Well, since I appear to have screwed up badly here, I apologize.  Of course,
> the alternative would be to stoop to your level, and simply drop-out of
> the argument rather than concede error.
> 
>                                DKMcK

Which argument do you claim I dropped out of "rather than concede error"?
How many people do you think you are going to move to anything but contempt
with your cheap innuendoes?  You had 'em snowed with your economic jargon 
for a while, Dan'l, but you are now making a fool of yourself.

						Baba