Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site ratex.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!ratex!mck
From: mck@ratex.UUCP (Daniel Kian Mc Kiernan)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Mislaid Note in Reply to Baba
Message-ID: <1104@ratex.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 29-Apr-85 13:38:46 EDT
Article-I.D.: ratex.1104
Posted: Mon Apr 29 13:38:46 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 30-Apr-85 06:44:48 EDT
Organization: Squids R Us
Lines: 19
Keywords: Kondrateiff


In 'Libertarian Arguments -- Reply to Baba', I noted that Baba had
misrepresented someone's opinion, and I denounced this misrepresentation as
an apparent (yes, folks, I did use the word 'apparently') lie.  Baba pointed
out that Cliff regarded the misrepresentation as an honest mistake, and said
that rather than 'stoop' to my 'level', he would assume that I had missed
Cliff's acceptance.
However, in 'Re: Libertarian Arguments -- Reply**3 to Baba', Baba now asserts

>(In the referenced article, I caught Dan'l in yet another attempt at libel.)

It would seem that refusal to 'stoop' was a mere rhetorical flourish.  In
fact, since Baba does not use a modifier like 'apparent', since unlike
Baba I have NEVER evaded an argument (or demonstrated any other forms of
dishonesty which would make an accusation of libel credible), Baba is being
FAR nastier than I've ever been.

                               TNX,
                               DKMcK