Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ttrdc.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!bellcore!allegra!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!mgnetp!ltuxa!ttrdc!mjk From: mjk@ttrdc.UUCP (Mike Kelly) Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: House Votes NIX on Contra Aid Message-ID: <164@ttrdc.UUCP> Date: Wed, 1-May-85 12:22:58 EDT Article-I.D.: ttrdc.164 Posted: Wed May 1 12:22:58 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 4-May-85 06:32:10 EDT References: <576@cadovax.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Teletype Corp., Skokie, IL Lines: 44 >From: jefff@cadovax.UUCP (Jeffery H. Fields) >For at least a year, the atrocities committed by the Contras will be stymied. >This will give time to the Sandinistas (so called Marxist-Leninist) to enact >their social reforms with less fear of military reprisal. The social workers >will be less victimized and thus able to improve conditions in the Nicaraguan >industrial sector, while their brothers and sisters in the rural areas will be >able to breath easier and get on with much needed land reform. I wish this were so. Unfortunately, the House vote was mainly symbolic. It is important in that it represented the wishes of the American people to repudiate this portion of the Reagan foreign policy in Central America. But I doubt it will stop the contras. The CIA works in many strange and mysterious ways, and will undoubtedly continue to support the terrorists they have trained and organized. One tactic that will surely be pursued is to obtain "private" funding for the contras -- a clear violation of the Neutrality Act, but it seems the CIA has little respect for U.S. or international law. Money may also be funnelled through other receipients of U.S. military assistance, such as Honduras. A strong sentiment against this in Congress *could* really restrain Reagan. But given the sympathy expressed toward economic sanctions during the contra vote, it seems unlikely that Congress will really muzzle the President. Economic sanctions will seriously harm the Nicaraguan economy, and drive it even more into the Soviet bloc for aid. Strangely enough, I think the State Department understands this very well and that is exactly the outcome they are seeking. A stronger Nicaraguan-Soviet alliance would provide the pretext for more aggressive actions against Nicaragua. And if Nicaragua tries to avoid strong ties to the Soviets, the economic turmoil can be exploited as the CIA described in its training manual. The only hope is strong support from the Western European and South American governments that see the Reagan policy as completely wrong-headed. But these governments are afraid to cross the Reagan Administration because of possible reprisals against them. So what is Nicaragua to do? Well, pretty much what it's done for the last six years: stand firm. Be open to U.S. conciliation, but expect the worse. (As Antonio Gramsci put it, "Pessimism of the mind, optimism of the will.") Try to cultivate allies in Western Europe and among the non-aligned countries. Try to avoid dependence on the Soviets. Fight like hell against the contras. And hope you survive until 1989. Mike Kelly